Search results for tag #snac2
![[?]](https://snac.tesio.it/giacomo/s/ada2e9f46fca746091009b2baffd00cc.png)
Non "più utili alla crescita" bensì "più probabili nei sistemi in crescita".
Un altro buon esempio è costituito dai tumori, le cui cellule mutano in modo imprevedibile: il tumore cresce più rapidamente del tessuto ospitante perché svincolato dall'ordine impresso nel DNA originale.
Nota che la crescita di cui parlo non è necessariamente positiva: l'impero romano all'apice della sua estensione era talmente fragile da finire in pezzi sotto la pressione di "barbari"; i sistemi unix hanno raggiunto complessità insostenibili che causano inevitabili vulnerabilità etc...
Allo stesso modo una dimensione ridotta può essere positiva: io per esempio ti sto scrivendo tramite #snac2, un nodo #ActivityPub scritto in C, piccolo ed efficiente.
![[?]](https://microhive.social/oliver/s/1488566d18306ce3bbfdc4a9bcfd3501.jpg)
Weil ich mit #Snac2 unterwegs bin, nenne ich das ja lieber #fedirunner
😉
Aber ja, das war eine gute Quote! Da geht mehr!
You don't know Snac? But you should: https://codeberg.org/grunfink/snac2
A simple, minimalistic and well documented #ActivityPub instance server written in C, no database needed, totally JavaScript-free, no cookies either, not much bullshit.
![[?]](https://snikket.de/social/menel/s/caf51b13f0d292085ff8b177266aae86.jpg)
Yeah. I can't see the difference between mute and delete for a post not written by me. It's gone either way isn't it?
The only difference is informing other parties about the delete if it was written by me, or am I overlooking something?
Edit: I asking because I'm thinking maybe one of the buttons could go away to make room, or change its behavior. Like "hide" could be instead "mute" to only not inform anymore on the conversation, but don't delete it (like mastodon does)
#snac #snac2
Does someone know the difference in "hide" and "delete" under a post?
What does this technically do, and how does it affect what I or others see from this post?
Is there a different behavior if it's my own post or something in my timeline?
It seems both options delete the post from my view. I only don't know whats the difference beside that.
Alt...
Picture of a mobile Screenshot of snac, showing and highlighting the mentioned options under a post
You don't know Snac? But you should: https://codeberg.org/grunfink/snac2
A simple, minimalistic and well documented #ActivityPub instance server written in C, no database needed, totally JavaScript-free, no cookies either, not much bullshit.
I think you should ask @grunfink@comam.es but given the syscalls' documentation, my guess is that #snac2 simply reserve access to the snac-data/ dir and lock it out of anything else (unless you disable_sandbox in the server config).
Well I don't like cloudflare, so we're good I think.
|sort|uniq -c
337 https://furry.engineer/inbox (403 Forbidden) [<!DOCTYPE html><html lang="en-US"><head><title>Just a moment#cloudflare #Snac2 #snac #federation
91 https://gimmeloli.cc/inbox (403 Forbidden) [<!DOCTYPE html><html lang="en-US"><head><title>Just a moment
169 https://pawb.fun/inbox (403 Forbidden) [<!DOCTYPE html><html lang="en-US"><head><title>Just a moment
116 https://pixelfed.social/f/inbox (403 Forbidden) [<!DOCTYPE html><html lang="en-US"><head><title>Just a moment
I'm now wondering if I should compile it with this, and what security it adds additionally to a systemd service file with all the restrictions about the filesystem and syscalls one can do.
Do I need to configure anything with landlock to "activate" it when I compile it in? I didn't yet find the right documentation that I can understand for it it seems.
Does snac somehow "know" what to landlock and which paths to allow before landlocking itself, maybe reading my config file before that happens?
#snac #snac2 (never know which tag to use here :) ) #landlock #linux #kernel #security #selfhosting
Danke! Ich nutze #Snac2 als ActivityPub Instance, nicht Mastodon. Manchmal mit Webclient, manchmal mit Mona, es könnte auch durchaus sein dass der Link wegen irgendwas anderem nicht aufglöst wird. Ist für mich nicht so wichtig, der Link an sich reicht ja.
To be honest, xs (and xs_json too) is infact what I liked most of #snac2 codebase: a non-conventional approach optimized for the specific use case.
Having said that, it looks trivial to modify _xs_json_load_lexer, xs_number_new, xs_number_get, xs_number_str to store/retrieve the double as a null terminated char[sizeof(double)+1].
I just wonder if it's worth the performance gain, tbh.
@lizzy@social.vlhl.dev @ada@zoner.work @kimapr@ublog.kimapr.net
in fact it doesn't cause any issue: #snac2 is likely the lightest and best performing #fediverse server out there.
@rozenglass@fedi.dreamscape.link @lizzy@social.vlhl.dev @ada@zoner.work
#snac #snac2
Needs some tags.
And this isn't visible so nobody that doesn't get it right at activitypub can see it.
I fear even the tags won't help for that. Let's see...
![[?]](https://wirebug.ch/beni/s/fb5c81ed3a220004b71069645f112867.png)
well, strictly speaking, a FTP access to the web server could be enough: just mount the folder with sshfs and run snac over it, as I did when I installed my own instance on a cheap shared hosting.
Obviously, if you have shell access to the server it's much simpler.
I have a question though: how you delete a user from #snac2? I mean, I read how to add users in the Administration manual, but I can't find how to delete a user (and if it can be done while running the server).
Is removing the user folder all you need to do? What about the account they were following? I guess they are not going to be unsubscribed that way...
You might be interested in
https://it-notes.dragas.net/2025/01/29/improving-snac-performance-with-nginx-proxy-cache/
Seems this solves the 499 ngnix issue.
A bit caching if big payloads.